Danny Haelewaters
PhD | mycologist | writer
  • About me
    • CV
  • #TeamLaboul
  • Research
    • Taxonomy and conservation
    • Evolutionary biology
    • Community ecology of trophic interactions
    • Student research
  • Pubs & talks
    • Publications by subject
    • Peer-reviewed papers
    • Book chapters
    • Conference presentations
    • Invited presentations
  • Funding
  • Teaching
    • Writing Academic Papers
  • Resources
    • A healthy research lab
    • A motivated research group
    • Avoiding helicopter research
    • Data organization in spreadsheets
    • Molecular phylogenetic methods
    • Infographic—effect of fungal infections on ladybird survival
    • Ant–Laboulbeniales literature
    • Bat fly–Laboulbeniales literature
  • Popsci
    • Populair wetenschappelijk (nl)
  • Blog
    • Danny’s blog
    • Sarah & Danny’s blog
  • About me
    • CV
  • #TeamLaboul
  • Research
    • Taxonomy and conservation
    • Evolutionary biology
    • Community ecology of trophic interactions
    • Student research
  • Pubs & talks
    • Publications by subject
    • Peer-reviewed papers
    • Book chapters
    • Conference presentations
    • Invited presentations
  • Funding
  • Teaching
    • Writing Academic Papers
  • Resources
    • A healthy research lab
    • A motivated research group
    • Avoiding helicopter research
    • Data organization in spreadsheets
    • Molecular phylogenetic methods
    • Infographic—effect of fungal infections on ladybird survival
    • Ant–Laboulbeniales literature
    • Bat fly–Laboulbeniales literature
  • Popsci
    • Populair wetenschappelijk (nl)
  • Blog
    • Danny’s blog
    • Sarah & Danny’s blog
  • Home
  • /
  • Blog

Fishy birds, birdy fish, poisonous fungi, and pizza: Our “scientific breakthroughs” published in predatory journal

Did you see Dan Baldassarre’s wonderful paper entitled “What’s the Deal with Birds?” published on April 1 (!) last year? If not, you’re in for a treat. Dan did something that I had been thinking of for quite a while, namely to reply to one of the countless requests for manuscripts that he, I, and probably most scientists who have ever published anything, receive from predatory journals. He decided to write up some crap, submit it, and try to get it published, to prove a point. You can retroactively follow the whole saga in his Twitter thread, and very well-deserved, the story received quite a bit of attention. And what’s not to like? Dan concluded that birds are weird, and a partial result was that penguins look like fish (weird).

Figure 1 from Baldassarre (2020).

Well, like I said, I had been planning on doing something similar for quite a while and discussed it with my friend Martin Stervander. Since I am an mycologist, and since Martin is an ornithologist who, at the time, worked on fish, we thought that Dan Baldassarre’s initial explorations were noteworthy, but felt that they could be expanded and go deeper. Thus, we embarked on a truly interdisciplinary collaboration that made use of cutting-edge methodology, and we could expand Dan Baldassarres’s observation quite dramatically:

Figure 1 from Stervander & Haelewaters (2020).

As the attentive reader will have seen, we can draw several conclusions from our study. As a side result, it turns out that barn swallows and flying fish are sister lineages (quite the taxonomic earth quake!). For the main result, we predict that penguins will re-evolve flight as poisonous fungi colonize the Antarctic if the temperature rises, and this decreased fishiness will increase the chances of you ordering a penguin pizza in the future! Didn’t quite catch that? Well, read our ground-breaking paper, and as a bonus you might pick one or two hints at the publishing industry (and other things)!

Writing this paper was fun and quick, and it has been accepted for publication in multiple journals. However, we were less successful than Dan Baldassarre at haggling to get it published without paying the ridiculous publication fees that makes up the core of the business model for predatory journals. So it has taken until now to finally get this paper pulbished, but along the way, we have received little golden nuggets, such as this “peer review report” from the Journal of Ecosystems and Ecography:

Our paper is now out in the Oceanography & Fisheries Open Access Journal, published by predatory Juniper Publishers. So what—and why? I am sure that some of you will think this is just rubbish, and that’s fine. Some might even find it NOT funny, or perhaps even vulgar. Well, I think that our paper very clearly demonstrates the total lack of review and the sole interest of profiting on authors that the predatory journal industry rests upon. We further intend to deal with this in a more formal and serious manner, using our fishy bird paper as an example. Keep your eyes open for that!

Note: This post was taken and edited, with permission, from Martin’s website.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Posted on January 12, 2021 by Danny Haelewaters. This entry was posted in Blog and tagged mycology, ornithology, predatory journal, predatory research. Bookmark the permalink.
2020 in numbers
Pizza paper making the rounds

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Follow @dhaelewa

    Include all fungi in biodiversity goals: our letter published in Science

    Looking for something?

    Follow my blog

    Enter your email address to subscribe to my website and receive notifications of new (blog) posts by email.

    Collection of ant–Laboulbeniales papers

    Collection of bat fly–Laboulbeniales papers

Looking for something?

Follow my blog

Category cloud

Biodiversiteit Biodiversity Biological sciences Blog Climate change Cultuur Ethiek Fungi Geen categorie Genetics/Genomics/Evolution Interview Klimaat Kortverhaal Laboulbeniales Media Microfungi Mycology News Nieuws Onderwaterwereld Opinie Opinion Parasites Recensie Reizen Wetenschap

Top Posts

Forensic Mycology: Taking Hebeloma to Court
Peer-reviewed papers
Danny Haelewaters
Genetische modificaties: voor of tegen?

Twitter

My Tweets
Powered by
 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.